Welcome
Mr. Brian P.Conry is a litigation attorney practicing in the areas of deportation defense and criminal defense. Focus areas include deportation cases, serious felony cases and post-conviction cases. When you decide to contact Mr. Conry, over 25 years of legal experience will be working for you. The law firm provides Spanish-language services (Espanol) through in-house paralegal staff.
Mr. Conry is one of a very small group of attorneys nationwide who have practiced criminal defense in the State, Circuit (State Trial Court level) and Appellate Courts and in the Federal, District (Federal Trial Court level) and Circuit Courts of Appeal as well as practicedimmigration law before the Executive Office of Immigration Appeal (EOIR)(the local immigration courts), before the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) and before the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.
Mr. Conry is accepting the defense of criminal charges against defendants in Oregon and Washington. He has had success at all levels of his representation of clients from acquittals in Federal criminal jury trials to appellate wins before the Board of Immigration Appeals, Oregon Court of Appeals and Ninth Circuit. He’s had success in the EOIR courts, the State Circuit Courts, winning jury trials and obtaining grants of Post Conviction Relief (PCR). In the EOIR courts he’s had success in obtaining grants of Cancellation of Removal and Suspension of Deportation.
News
You may be able to regain lost immigration status... do not miss your last opportunity to remedy past ineffective assistance of counsel! |
Posiblemente usted puede recuperar su estado inmigratorio perdido ... !No pierda la última oportunidad de buscar remedio por ayuda legal ineficaz y arreglar o anular condenas penales! |
Oregon Padilla PCR (post-conviction relief) claims of ineffective assistance of counsel pre-dating convictions incurred March 30, 2010 or earlier must be filed by March 30, 2012. Oregon has a two year statute of limitations on post conviction relief claims.
Padilla's conviction was in 2001. The Padilla case itself states that the national standards that are invoked to lay the foundation for the principle that immigrants must be advised of the immigration consequences of their conviction goes back some fifteen years from March 2010.
In Oregon, approximately fifteen year or maybe seventeen year old convictions in 2012 can reasonably be challenged in PCR proceedings. The good argument is that they are actually timely, and not time barred because they are Padilla "dependent" claims, up until two years after Padilla was decided in March 2010 . That is, no one would have known to file such a PCR case based on reading federal law up until the Padilla decision itself was decided.
Are there many more cases out there that the "convicted" just do not know that they just might be missing their opportunity to get their legal permanent resident status intact or potential future status as a legal permanent resident preserved? Please email this alert or talk to friends or acquaintances who might benefit therefrom.
Law Office of Brian Patrick Conry, P.C.
711 Willamette Building • 534 S.W. Third Avenue • Portland, Oregon 97204
(503) 274-4430 bpconry@gmail.com